Skip to main content

Executive Pay At First Class Counties

The first post of 2023 is on executive pay at first class county cricket clubs.  Figures are taken from 2021 accounts (or in a couple of instances accounts for the year to 31 January 2022) and are part of 2021 accounts post trilogy, along with the prestigious Bentley - Forbes Consulting rankings and 2021 membership figures.

A quick note on methodology - the figures in the table below are compiled from the Key Management Personnel (KMP) related parties disclosure in the individual county's financial statements. The table is in alphabetical order rather than having the highest paying county at the top as it's not really fair to compare counties as although all businesses have to disclose payments to KMP there is not set definition of what a KMP does.  So you might get two counties (A&B) paying exactly the same wages for exactly the same roles, but county A might have a higher level of payments to KMP as A considers a particular role to be a KMP but B doesn't.  That said KMP is rather more useful in looking at trends in payments to  county cricket senior executives over time and there a few thoughts on that below, but first the 2021 results.


 

  2021
Derbyshire  184,756
Durham  148,775
Essex  516,728
Glamorgan  551,801
Gloucester  381,749
Hampshire  119,100
Kent  583,398
Lancashire  1,349,117
Leicestershire  127,047
Middlesex  264,104
Northamptonshire  NA
Nottinghamshire  512,082
Somerset  197,953
Sussex  603,936
Surrey  1,005,000
Warwicksire  634,276
Worcestershire  NA
Yorkshire  1,925,700
   9,105,522

KMP Payments for 2020 were £7,340,319 so there is an apparent 34% year - year increase.  However, this is mis - leading for four reasons.  Firstly Gloucestershire disclosed a figure for 2021 KMP but not for 2020.  Secondly Yorkshire showed a sharp increase to almost £2m in 2021 from less than £1m in 2020 but I think quite a large slice of that was severance payments for executives who negotiated a settlement in the wake of the Azeem Rafiq revelations. Thirdly Hampshire seemed to have restructured in 2021 to have a separate company for county cricket operations, making comparisons difficult. Finally 2020, the "year of covid" was a down year for KMP so the 2021 payments include a bit of bounce back.  We can deal with points 1,2&3 by taking  Yorkshire's, Gloucestershire's and Hampshire's figures out of the comparatives and when we do that the 2021 figure is a 9% increase on 2020, so still a fairly chunky rise but some of that will be covid related.

Going back to 2016 maybe gives a better feel for the overall trend for first class county executive pay.  Now we have to do quite a bit of juggling with the data (Northamptonshire disclosed KMP in 2016 but not 2021, Middlesex & Gloucestershire disclosed in 2021 but not 2016 and for the reasons already covered Yorkshire's and Hampshire's 2021 figure aren't representative / consistent with the 2016 disclosure.  Normalising for all of this, the increase from 2016 to 2021 is just shy of 20%, around 4% per year, roughly comparable to wage increases in the private sector. We are talking about well paid individuals but the rate of increase isn't egregious.

In terms of individual counties, KMP payments for Leicestershire declined very slightly between 2016 and 2021 and Warwickshire's payments only increased by a few pounds.  Kent had the biggest increase in percentage terms and Lancashire in absolute terms (although it could be argued that Lancashire was a more complicated business in 2021 than in 2016). 

     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre