Skip to main content

County Members

The 15 counties that are members' organisations submit returns to the FCA (Well they are supposed to, a bit more on that below) which include the number of members.  The figures for 2021 are as follows:


County Members
Derbyshire 871
Essex* 4348
Glamorgan 2180
Gloucester 3590
Kent 1570
Lancashire 3460
Leicestershire 880
Middlesex 7312
Nottinghamshire 5475
Somerset 6713
Sussex 1671
Surrey 17115
Warwickshire* 4418
Worcestershire 1787
Yorkshire 3408
  64798
  
The asterix next to Warwickshire and Essex is because those counties haven't managed to file their 2021 annual returns, it's only a legal requirement chaps, no need to rush.  In the absence of 2021 data, I've used 2019 figures.  So roughly 65,000 county members, perhaps a few less.  

The data section of the excellent Bythesightscreen blog includes data on county membership numbers going back as far as 2005.  It shows memberships as 71,000 for 2010 so not much of a drop of over the next 11 years.  But the relatively constant numbers for the 15 members' organisations conceals some big changes at individual counties. Surrey only had 7k members in 2010 and have more than doubled that number since.  In 2021 25% of all county members were Surrey members.  Other counties have kept their membership pretty constant over the last 11 years and some have seen numbers fall sharply.  Derbyshire and Leicestershire now have less than 1k members & Yorkshire and Lancashire have both seen membership numbers almost half since 2010.  

One note of caution, as ever with county cricket statistics different counties do different things.  So at Surrey there is a white ball membership.  At other counties 20/20 season tickets and the like don't qualify the holder for membership.  As the county championship has shrunk from 16 to 14 games with fewer of those games being played at the summer and on weekends it's not unreasonable to think some cricket watchers may have replaced memberships with season tickets and membership numbers are not strictly comparable between counties.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre