Skip to main content

Metrobank Cup

Tomorrow sees the final of the county 50 over a side Metrobank cup, played at Trent Bridge between Hampshire and Leicestershire.  I don't think Hampshire's John Turner will be fit in time to play - but he's an interesting cricketer.  Picked for the T20 international series against New Zealand he is a classic new era ECB selection, born outside the UK (South Africa) and selected for having the right attributes of pace and bounce, rather than consistent performances, not his fault -  he's only played a total of thirty games in top level cricket.

But he's also an example of how the county game can help to identify talent.  Hampshire gave him his initial chance in the 2021 season when call ups to The Hundred had left them short of bowlers for the 50 over competition.  It would be unlikely a player would get this chance if the county game was boiled down to 8 (or 10) provincial sides.

So to celebrate tomorrow's final I've come up with a team of the tournament to date, but with the proviso of only including players under 25.  And I'm also giving you two Prices for the price of two.  Mostly done on averages although I was impressed by the keeping of Macintosh of Durham (and Scotland).

Will any of the players replicate John Turner's rapid rise?  Ignoring Privthi Shaw, who has already played for India, the two I'll look out for are the two 19 year olds, I know Ben Kellaway impressed Warwickshire supporters who saw him against the Bears and Josh Hull of Leicestershire is 6 foot 7 inches tall and bowls left arm, so I'm be pretty sure he's on a list at the ECB.

Name

       Age

County

Runs

Batting AV.

Strike Rate

Wickets

Bowling AV

RPO

 

 

 

 

 

(per over)

 

 

 

P. Shaw

23

Northants

429

143

9.2

 

 

 

O. Price

22

Gloucester

575

82.14

5.5

3

47.3

5.9

F. Middleton

21

Hampshire

465

51.66

5.5

 

 

 

S Budinger

24

Leicestershire

391

43.44

8

 

 

 

J Evison

21

Kent

166

55

6.7

0

NA

7.5

B Kellaway

19

Glamorgan

195

32.5

7.6

13

22.9

5.4

T Mackintosh

20

Durham

92

46

5.3

 

 

 

G. Hill

22

Yorkshire

66

13.2

6.5

5

28.4

4.3

T.Price

23

Gloucester

108

21.6

5.6

13

22

4.5

H. Qadri

22

Kent

34

5.7

5.3

14

21.6

5.2

J. Hull

19

Leicestershire

3

NA

4.5

15

22.5

5.5




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre