Skip to main content

Win The Toss And?

For the last three seasons in the county championship the away side can opt to bowl first without there being a toss.  If the away side doesn't take that option there is a toss in the usual way.

I thought it would be interesting to see what impact this rule had both on the decisions made by captains and the results of the games.  This is the first of two posts on this topic and covers the first 40 games of the 2018 season (i.e. up to the round of matches ending 14th May.)

In this period two games were abandoned without a ball being bowled.  Of the other 38, on 24 occasions the away side took the option of bowling first.  But not with a notable degree of success.  In nine of those gains the side sent in to bat won.  The tactic of bowling first was successful on 7 occasions with 8 draws.

Of the 14 games where the was a toss the side winning the toss chose to bat first on 13 occasions.  Five of those bat first decisions resulted in a win, with four defeats and four draws.  Just one brave skipper bucked the trend, won the toss and bowled and Paul Plucky Collingwood came up with a win.  This might be seen as a triumph for experience and sagacity but in that game Leicestershire, put into bat, scored 440 and skittled Durham for just 184.  With the follow on enforced Durham scored 400 and bowled out Leicestershire to win.  Whatever he may say I don't believe that was how Collingwood planned it.   

So the evidence would seem to suggest it doesn't really matter if you bowl or bat first.  Teams inserted by an away captain won slightly more games than they lost as did teams who won the toss and chose to bat but the differences are small.  Interestingly a Cricinfo review of whether it was better to bat first or second in test matches between 2000 - 2013 found England was the best country to bat first in.  Unlike India which is a bowl first country for the period.  Which is completely opposite to what I would have expected, sometimes looking at the numbers does help.

What also comes out of the 2018 county championship figures is that captains don't have much idea about what a pitch is going to do.  Of the 24 times a captain thought they should forgo the toss and bowl first, only 7 came up with a win.

The next post will look at the  first 40 games 2015 season (i.e. the last season before away sides were able to put the opposition in without a toss) to see if there was a different pattern in results and in particular if sides choosing to bowl first had a better record.

Comments

  1. Cricketer Sarah Taylor Biography, Facts And Best Hot Wallpapers

    http://www.zardly.com/cricketer-sarah-taylor-biographyfacts-and-best-hot-wallpapers/

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really love your site.. Great colors & theme. Did you make this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m hoping to create my very own blog and would love to know where you got this from or exactly what the theme is named. Thanks! Cricket Live



    Everyone loves it when individuals get together and share opinions. Great website, continue the good work! T10 Cricket League Live



    Good info. Lucky me I recently found your site by chance (stumbleupon). I've saved it for later!



    This blog was... how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I've found something which helped me. Cheers!



    Everything is very open with a very clear clarification of the issues. It was definitely informative. Your site is very helpful. Thanks for sharing! Pak vs Aus live streaming



    I'd like to thank you for the efforts you have put in writing this blog. I'm hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts by you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my own, personal blog now ;)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre