Skip to main content

Steve Smith - How Could We Have Known?

Steve Smith averaged 137.4 in the 2017  - 2018 ashes series.  Since then he has shown a little vulnerability against spinners who turn the ball away from him.  Adil Rashid dismissed him twice in the five ODIs following the ashes and in the South African test series he has been out three times out of four to left arm spinners.  (Once Dean Elgar and twice Kesav Maharaj).

England selected an ashes squad which guaranteed Smith would not have to face this type of bowling, there was no orthodox left arm spinner and the leg spinner, Mason Crane, was a selection for the future not a realistic option for selection.

My first thought was this apparent vulnerability was really just random and, before the ashes, there was no way,  England could have realised Adil Rasid or Jack Leach might play an important part.  That was before I saw cricviz, who in their 11 November 2017 article wrote:

"Although Smith has an exceptional record against both pace and spin a closer look at his statistics reveal a weakness against leg spin – averaging 39.77, and against left arm finger spin – averaging 37.05. Unfortunately for England they don’t have a left arm finger spinner in their Test squad and are highly unlikely to play their leg spinner Mason Crane, especially not at the start of the series.
Smith’s average against off spin of 84.61 is higher than against any other bowler-type"
I don't know much about Cricviz, they look like a pretty professional outfit.  But if they could spot this so clearly and so early why couldn't the ECB, which has money to burn.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre