Skip to main content

English Cricket Finances - Counties

I have pulled together a spreadsheet summarising income and costs for the 18 first class counties.  Data is taken from the most recent financial statements, with the exception of Surrey who have just filed their financial statements for the period to 31 January 2017, I'll update this post once I have a copy of these Surrey accounts. Middlesex don't seemed to have filed accounts for the period to 31 December 2016, although I think these are now overdue.

A few points on the aggregate figures.

The 18 first class counties made a combined loss before tax for the period of £2.6m.  Viewed in isolation this doesn't look too bad but it includes a Surrey profit of £3m.  Also most counties have taken on a significant amount of debt in the last decade.  For the counties making a loss / small profit the issue is are they able to pay off the debt as it falls due.  A particularly pertinent question for Durham, Glamorgan (both of whom have almost gone belly up in the last two years) and Warwickshire all three lost £1m+ in 2016.  Just looking at one years figures is a bit reductive (there is a general consensus 2016 wasn't a great year because of the tours) so I will expand and provide some balance sheet analysis in future posts.

Also interesting is how much internally generated revenue the counties produce.  For 2016 total revenue for all 18 counties is £142m of which ECB grants makes up £40m, about 28%.  For a county like Surrey the ECB's money is nice to have but not a massive slice of total revenues and even for a non  - test county ECB grants generally make up about half, perhaps a little less of total revenue.  And even if the county structure was swept away the ECB would still need to fund first class cricket, a national youth development system and keep a number of grounds able to hold test match crowds.

You can upload my figures here , I have a pretty full set of county financial statements so if anyone would like to see what there county is up to, let me know.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre