Skip to main content

ECB Media Rights Deal

The ECB has announced a media rights deal to run from 2020 - 2024 (i.e five years in total).  This is their Press statement

The deal sees the return of live English cricket to terrestial TV but only for 20/20, all tests and 50 over ODIs remain behind Sky's pay wall.  In men's cricket the BBC will show 10 games from the new domestic 20/20 competition including the final (which is good news as I think the original intention was that Sky would have exclusive rights to the final). There will also be two live, men's international 20/20 games on the BBC plus one women's 20/20 international on the BBC.

An interesting snippet is that Sky are proposing a cricket only channel, might that mean cheaper access for people who only want the cricket channel?

The ECB are claiming the total rights package (Sky plus BBC)  is worth £1.1 billion.  If the figure is correct it is a big step up from the existing deal.  The Daily Telegraph reckons the previous deal was worth £0.450 billion but in fact the uplift is even bigger than that.  The previous deal seems to have been worth £0.26 billion for the original 4 year term, with a subsequent two year extension taking the package to the £0.45 billion but for six years.  In valuing the two deals like for like you have to take inflation into account (I'm pretty sure Sky doles out the cash from 2020 to 2024 so some of the £1.1 billion is 7 years away.)  but even then the ECB is going to be earning twice as much from its TV rights post 2020 than it does currently.

Although the ECB gets a lot of criticism it seems to have got a good deal here, more revenue and a bit of terrestial TV coverage as well.  The question is what does it do with its new found riches, and I'll be posting on that soon.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre