Skip to main content

Executive Salaries in County Cricket

This post is a follow up to a salary cap for county chief executives which looked at the amounts paid to Key Management Personnel at the first class cricket counties.  I've now updated this for 2018 and 2019

 


  20192018
Derbyshire  164,851156,974
Durham  165,127238,246
Essex  577,723467,881
Glamorgan  558,102423,277
Hampshire  421,499523,405
Kent  554,286492,375
Lancashire  1,448,110950,460
Leicestershire  128,335136,368
Nottinghamshire  511,575477,821
Somerset  142,25397,716
Sussex  610,949545,659
Surrey  1,216,0001,063,000
Warwickshire  772,741629,871
Yorkshire  856,983654,025
   8,128,5346,857,078

Although tempting, it's not really fair to use the table for county by county comparisons as there is no fixed definition of Key Management Personnel.  But year on year comparisons of the total paid to county chief executives and other senior management are more valid and the table shows the amount paid increased by 18% between 2018 & 2019.  Quite a pay rise.

The increase isn't necessarily all down to increased salaries there may be an inflation in the number of KMP as well.  For instance Lancashire opened their hotel in 2019 and presumably that has led to more senior management.  

The question is whether both the level and the rate of increase of KMP salaries are appropriate?  In my opinion the answer is no on both counts.  The rate of increase is particularly concerning. Money flowed into English cricket via The World Cup and home Ashes series in 2019, but that seems to have ratcheted up the amount paid to senior administrators, which might set a new level for other, less prosperous, years.  

I think the answer here is to put a hard limit on the amount any one person can earn working for a county cricket club.  There's room for debate about where that limit should be - around about £200k seems right.  After all a salary cap for players is well established.  

* Four counties not shown, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire claim all their key positions are filled by unpaid committee members, Northants file abbreviated accounts without KMP disclosure and Middlesex can't get anything right

 

Comments

  1. Pls contact me on this no.+91 8770126974. I have something big deal for u . Love ur content and I have something for u pls rply or contact me

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pls rply bro it's for earning from ur blogs through Google ada

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre