Skip to main content

India and The Toss

Lots of statements from commentators (both paid and unpaid) about the value of winning the toss and batting first in India.  Universally held, winning the toss is a big advantage and quite a few comments along the lines of, "once we lost the toss, we'd lost the game."

And I can see why people say this, logically if batting becomes harder over time, you want to bat earlier in the game.

But looking at the statistics there is very little support for this.  Using cricinfo's stats guru function it is possible to see what happened to the side batting first in each game played in India for the period from 2000.  There's a nice round 100 games in the period (doesn't include current test) and the stats for the 21st century are.

Bat 1  = Win =     32

Bat 1  = lose =     41

Bat 1 = Draw =    27

So across a decent sample size the evidence seems to suggest, in complete contrast to intuition, bat second.

Do I believe this?

Wellllll  ..... Not really.

A few things to put on the other side of the scales.  Over those 100 games India have batted first on 43 occasions. The best way to win tests in India is to er, be India.  So India batting second more often than first is a partial explanation for the apparent advantage to batting second.

Also if we focus in on the last five years the statistics flip, now batting first is the best option with 16 wins against 10 defeats.  But I think you have to be cautious with this, as the sample size gets smaller so does the possibility that what's being seen as a pattern is just random variation.  

Conclusion

I don't think the statistics give a clear picture.  If I was the England captain (admittedly unlikely) I think I'd be wary of batting second in India, despite the statistical evidence.  But although stats can't tell you everything they do show the "lose the toss lose the game" mantra is rarely, if ever, correct.  

Just looking at the current test match, clearly the pitch is turning a lot, but from what I've seen it's turned a lot from the start.  India may have a slight advantage from batting first, but I'd say the big factor is that they are good side who play particularly well at home.  A top three of two dashers followed by a plodder means they are well suited to pitches where the best place to bat is at the top of the order.  (England are understandably better set up for English conditions and 1,2,3 are really there to take the new ball and set things up for the strength of the batting at 4 - 7).

The brilliant, slightly mad, Pant is perfect for quick lower order runs (England could have countered with Buttler but you can't blame Indian soil for English rotation) and most importantly India have the best spinner in the world (They may well have had the second best as well if it wasn't for Jadeja's injury).  In this game Ashwin has taken 5:43, average 9, all other bowlers 16:458, average 29.

If you want to win in India, it's best to be India.

Comments

  1. Indian cricketer Jasprit Bumrah on Monday tied the knot with the TV presenter Sanjana Ganesan in a traditional ceremony. Sharing beautiful pictures from the marriage ceremony, Jasprit Bumrah and Sanjana Ganesan shared a quote “Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course. Read the full article visit here: Jasprit Bumrah Marriage

    ReplyDelete
  2. Greetings! Very helpful advice in this particular article!
    invitation boxes

    ReplyDelete
  3. Credible Information. The Article over here is very much impressive and contains good and valuble information.
    if you want know who will win match today and
    today cricket match prediction visit stumps and bails.
    Also, We aim to provide 100% accurate & free cricket match prediction tips and cricket live score.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This was an extremely enlightening post. Thankful for this Blog, if you should explore more about such a data, you can see Youtube

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

County Championship Salary Cap

This is post about salaries in county cricket. The first class counties are subject to a cap and a collar on amounts paid in wages to cricketers.  They must pay above a collar, currently £0.75m, and below a cap, currently £2m. There is an agreement for both the collar and the cap to increase over the next funding round to 2024. In 2024 the collar will be £1.5m and the cap £2.5m What is less clear is what payments count towards the cap and collar.  I assume employers' national insurance (a 13% tax on wages) isn't included.  Similarly I assume payments to coaching staff don't count towards the cap as if they did, Somerset, Lancashire and Yorkshire would all be over the current £2m cap.  I've gone through the accounts of the first class counties to see what, if any, disclosure, they include on players' wages.  What gets disclosed varies enormously, quite a lot for some counties, nothing for others.  Additionally there is a possibility the information include

Mo Bobat and County Cricket

Cricinfo has this  interview with ECB "Performance Director" Mo Bobat.  Bobat makes an interesting claim about county cricket, "Take something like county batting average. We know that a county batting average does not significantly predict an international batting average, so a lot of the conventional things that are looked at as being indicators of success - they don't really stand true in a predictive sense."  And later in the article there is a graph, showing county averages plotted against test averages for 13 English test batsmen.  This is reproduced below. better than random? raw data suggests no meaningful link between championship and test averages 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Test County Championship Sam Curran England players' batting averages

English County Cricket Finance: 2018 Bentley Forbes Rankings

I have gone through the most recent financial statements for the English first class counties,  made an estimate of the financial strength of each and given them a Bentley Forbes Consulting ( TM ) financial sustainability ranking.  The overall table looks like this. County      Profit Assets Ranking Position Essex   4   4   4   1 Surrey   1   7   4   1 Nottinghamshire   5   5   5   3 Somerset   2   8   5   3 Derbyshire   8   3   5   5 Leicestshire    6   6  6   6 Sussex  15   1  8   7 Middlesex  14   2  8   7 Kent     9   9  9   9 Worcestshire    3  15  9 10 Gloucestshire   7  12  9.5 11 Northamptonshire   11  13  12 12 Glamorgan   16  10  13 13 Durham     12  14  13 13 Yorkshire    10  17  13 15 Warwickshire   17  11  14 16 Lancashire   13  16  14 17        The approach is to rank the counties for profitability and balance sheet strength and combine the two measures in a sustainability ranking. The balance sheet strength is itself a combination of thre